Happy Day of Birth Bob Bedore and Family aswellas Mormons!!!
William Bramscher 26 July 2017
Within this tune #NewRomantics Taylor Swift:
“It’s poker, he can’t see it in my face But I’m about to play my Ace”
US Supreme Court! Nepotism exists as these fifty (50) pages contain the signature of Kris Martinez Appeal Clerk Denver County Court!! This U.S. District Court District of Colorado Judge Lewis T. Babcock Smash! Kangaroo Court YOU MAY suck my WHITE NIGGER COCK (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan) JUDGEMENT!!!
Never say #asyouwish! This Taylor Alison Swift is #CrazyCrazyCrazy. I was in seat 11 last night for the movie C11 and 11 is 89 Fibonacci Sequence Math is Fun!! I bought my METROpcs phone from reseller BIG DOG INVOICE: 89058 MODEL: 610214652539 #WiccusDickis SUBTOTAL $145.00 USD!!!
1/89 = 0.011235955056179775…
Hey Saint Neary Lagoon #Snapshot Houston Means I’m One Day Closer to You! How Will You Know Taylor Swift!! #TakeMeWithU #IDWLF #FaceValue Taylor Alison Swift added a new photo. · (12:09)!!! #Keepswinging #Hit #Home #IWDFU!!!!
With USA TODAY Published 4:18 p.m. ET 21 July 2017:
The ACLU of Kentucky hailed the ruling, saying it should serve as a reminder to public officials in Kentucky of the cost of violating civil liberties.
“It is unfortunate that Kentucky taxpayers will likely bear the financial burden of the unlawful actions and litigation strategies of an elected official,” William Sharp, the ACLU[s’] legal director, said in a statement.
Spiderweb No Doubt! ACLU Nationwide Sponsored: Churches and religious leaders already have freedom of speech. But they shouldn’t be able to play partisan politics and keep their tax benefits too!! Colorado pot taxes aren’t going where they’re supposed to, and lawmakers are scrambling “I would talk to the governor about (calling a special session),” said Sen. Lucia Guzman, D-Denver, one of bill’s sponsors. “We have to do everything we can” The Denver Post a phrase, generally attributed to James Otis about 1761, that reflected the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they elected no representatives and became an anti-British slogan before the American Revolution; in full, “Taxation without representation is tyranny”!!!
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CLERK WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001 Scott S. Harris, Clerk By: Jacob C. Travers #SUCKit! William Robert “Billy bob” Bramscher #45 Questions Presented #SCOTUS!! I’m just doing my job. You give me that “juris-my-dick-tion” crap… you can cram it up your ass!!! (See Jurisdiction of Cause)
Media Registration for: 15-cv-1974-WJM-KLM – Mueller v. Swift etal.!
I care about Tay alot. I understand the story. I know how important this is!!
I promise to read about your case soon and help in anyway I am able…
At the Douglas County Library the Guest Pass for the computers are printed like tickets as today the colour is White 1225040639! (See #ForbiddenColors) #Safe&Sound hers my only concern as I have solidified my intent as an Objective Journalist seeking #Truth. Out for a minute i realized I am her #Superman undercover a simple bard poet reporter!!
“Investigation and Cultivation of the Mind“
No matter what you read in the headlines I may not believe Taylor Swift would give-up on my story and what I have to offer her. Tomorrow I am going to spend the most wonderful day in Denver and investigate Media Registration for: 15-cv-1974-WJM-KLM – Mueller v. Swift etal.:
The Rules of Evidence do not permit evidence of past conduct to prove conduct on a particular occasion. Federal Rule of Evidence 404(a)(evidence “of a person’s character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion”). The concern with such character evidence is twofold:
We fear that evidence of an individual’s bad character will prejudice the jury, causing them to find against him on the basis of past actions because he is “a bad guy,” or because he “deserved it.” We also reject the deterministic idea that an individual is bound to repeat past mistakes despite attempts to alter and reform one’s behavior as this would itself belie the deterrent effect of our penal system.
Robert P. Duffield II, Distorting the Limits of FRE 406: A Tough Habit to Break 38 Rutgers L.J. 897, 910 n.64 (Spring 2007).
An exception to the prohibition on this evidence is Rule 406. The rule, entitled Habit; Routine Practice, states:
Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice.
This rule permits a litigant to admit prior conduct as evidence of similar conduct on a particular occasion if the prior conduct amounts to a habit or routine practice. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 1519, 1523 (11th Cir. 1985).
With The Denver Post “Judge blocks Taylor Swift[s’] expert witness testimony about former Denver radio host’s threatened masculinity” continuing U.S. District Judge William Martinez partially blocked the testimony of Swift’s expert witness, University of Colorado Boulder gender studies professor Lorraine Bayard De Volo, whose written report showed that she intended to testify that Mueller fit the profile of a man likely to sexually assault a woman because of perceived threats to his masculinity.
Also with The Denver Post “Judge sanctions former Denver radio host for destroying evidence in Taylor Swift lawsuit” continuing “A federal judge has sanctioned a former Denver radio host, who sued Taylor Swift, for destroying multiple electronic devices containing key evidence in the case.” #Snapshot!
Flash Flood Warning this area til 10:15 PM MDT. Avoid flood areas.
Check local media. -NWS
Type: Imminent severe alert 7:12 PM MST
CLUE: “As computers and use of the Internet have become more commonplace, however, there are now increasing numbers of the more varied situational sex offenders….If the investigation identifies enough of these patterns, many of the remaining ones can be assumed. However, no particular number constitutes “enough”. A few may be enough if they are especially significant. Most of thies indicators mean little by themselves, but as they are identified and accumulate through investigation they can constitution reason to believe a suspect is a preferential sex offender.” Serial Offenders Theory and Practice Kevin Borgeson with Kirsten Kuehnle, Jones & Bartlett Learning, Canada, 6339 Ormindale Way, Mississauga ONTARIO L5V IJ2 p81.
“Mueller admits destroying or losing the cellular phone, laptop, iPad and computer for a variety of reasons including that he spilled coffee on his laptop’s keyboard. ‘It was fried’, Mueller said. But he also acknowledged the recording would have been important evidence in the case.” Judge sanctions, supra.
“Martinez wrote that Mueller was the only person with the complete audio recording and knew full well that litigation was imminent “since he was pursuing it.” Ibid.
“He made the decision — inexplicably, in the court’s view — to alter the original evidence and to present his lawyer with only ‘clips’ hand-picked from the underlying evidence,” Martinez wrote. Ibid.
Rule 1001(b) A “recording” consists of letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent recorded in any manner as (d) An “original” of a writing or recording means the writing or recording itself or any counterpart intended to have the same effect by the person who executed or issued it. For electronically stored information, “original” means any printout — or other output readable by sight — if it accurately reflects the information. An “original” of a photograph includes the negative or a print from it.
Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Content: An original is not required and other evidence of the content of a writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if: (a) all the originals are lost or destroyed, and not by the proponent acting in bad faith; (b) an original cannot be obtained by any available judicial process; (c) the party against whom the original would be offered had control of the original; was at that time put on notice, by pleadings or otherwise, that the original would be a subject of proof at the trial or hearing; and fails to produce it at the trial or hearing; or (d) the writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling issue. #Faith
Courts have also identified specific factors to use in determining whether the prior conduct is a habit or routine practice.
In deciding whether certain conduct constitutes habit, courts consider three factors: (1) the degree to which the conduct is reflexive or semi-automatic as opposed to volitional; (2) the specificity or particularity of the conduct; and (3) the regularity or numerosity of the examples of the conduct.
United States v. Angwin, 271 F.3d 786, 799 (9th Cir. 2001); see also Simplex, Inc. v. Diversified Energy Sys., Inc., 847 F.2d 1290, 1293 (7th Cir. 1988) (“before a court may admit evidence of habit, the offering party must establish the degree of specificity and frequency of uniform response that ensures more than a mere ‘tendency’ to act in a given manner, but rather, conduct that is ‘semi-automatic’ in nature”).
Colorado does not have a right to work law, at least one that is similar to those of other states, despite efforts to pass one (a ballot initiative failed in 2012). However, the state operates a kind of hybrid policy under its Labor Peace Act (PDF).
Colorado does not have a right to work law, at least one that is similar to those of other states, despite efforts to pass one (a ballot initiative failed in 2012). However, the state operates a kind of hybrid policy under its Labor Peace Act (PDF). Under this act, employees at most workplaces are not required to join a union or pay dues, even though they enjoy the same compensation and benefits as union members. By not joining the union, however, workers are not covered by union protections (including legal representation in employment disputes).
But Colorado also allows workers to override right to work provisions by becoming an “all-union” shop. This is achieved by a 75 percent approval vote by employees, a process that is overseen by the Colorado Department of Labor (see the department’s Labor Relations / Unions section for information on how to initiate a unionization vote).
Colorado follows the legal doctrine of “employment-at-will” which provides that in the absence of a contract to the contrary, neither an employer nor an employee is required to give notice or advance notice of termination or resignation. Additionally, neither an employer nor an employee is required to give a reason for the separation from employment. In Continental Airlines Inc. v. Keenan (1987), the Colorado Supreme Court recognized at-will employment in Colorado, and noted that there may be certain exceptions to the presumption of at-will employment. #TooFunky
Pretrial Supervision Programs are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!
Please enjoy the following WordPress.com “Pretrial Supervision is Unconstitutional” and other amazing stories…
#Safety (#Faith) #Trust (#Hope) #Love #MakeAmericaGayAgain#MakeAmericaLoveAgain #UniteAmerica #AmericanHistory #Politics#CaseLaw #Constitution #Freedom #Petition#DueProcess#EqualProtectionOfLaws #BlessedMother #Equality #BlackLivesMatter
#AllLiveMatter #CivilRights #Peace #Middle
CC: John W. Hickenlooper Michael B. Hancock U.S. Senator Al FrankenColorado Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United States ACLU of Colorado ACLU NationwideBarack Obama The United States Of AmericaDenver Westword The Denver Post The Denver Press Club CNN CNN International CNN en Español CNN.money NPR NPR Politics Fox NewsNBC News ABC News CBS News PBS NewsHour
Convictions will not stand without resolution on appeal yet the following WordPress.com “Dismiss with Prejudice – Outrageous Governmental Conduct” will prove beyond-doubt that this #System of #American Criminal Justice is designed to fail.
#Safety (#Faith) #Trust (#Hope) #Love #MakeAmericaGayAgain#MakeAmericaLoveAgain #UniteAmerica #AmericanHistory #Politics#CaseLaw #Constitution #Freedom #Petition #DueProcess#EqualProtectionOfLaws #BlessedMother #Equality #BlackLivesMatter#AllLivesMatter #CivilRights #Peace #Middle
CC: John W. Hickenlooper Michael B. Hancock U.S. Senator Al FrankenColorado Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United States ACLU of Colorado ACLU Nationwide Barack Obama The United States Of AmericaDenver Westword The Denver Post The Denver Press Club CNN CNN International CNN en Español CNNMoney NPR NPR Politics Fox NewsNBC News ABC News CBS News PBS NewsHour
It’s official!!! I totally have a super-duper CRUSH for Taylor Swift!!!
One of these nights I desire to share with you a dream…
Everyone does know I super-duper have a crush for Miss Taylor Swift…
With this in mind eYe actually believe her Pop’s and brother would enjoy my energy!!!
GONZO: Just finished tha final edit for “First Amendment Retaliation” on my WordPress blog…
The more I write… the more right I feel!!!
Sharing my honest and true story… I love myself so much…
The TRUTH will set you FREE!!!