William Bramscher 30 July 2017
Hey Jeff Colwell The United States District Court District of Colorado:
WHO IN THE FUCK ARE YOU?!?
Suggestions: Bloom, Fabulous, Community Pool.
i left that voicemail early in the morning the other nite as you know. Please be aware We
are very pleased with your vote
look forward to working with you in the future As above As below
! #ImComingOut!! Jacobs Ladder!!!
30-Day Writing Challenge
This thread shall be dedicated to this creative challenge…
~Gonzo journo & method writer Billy bob Bramscher (~BbB~)
#Writing #Creativity #MethodWriting
(May be posted the following day depending on connectivity issues and other circumstances)
IN RE Writing Music:
“So over the years alot of people have asked me too sort-of describe my song writing process from beginning to end. How long does it take? Where do you write? What are the circumstances? Do you start with music? Do you start with lyrics? Ummm… And, my answer is always that it happens differently every time. And that’s why I’m still soo in love with song writing.” ~Taylor Swift, 1989 D.L.X.
“1989 — released through Big Machine Records — sold 3.66 million copies in 2014, according to Nielsen Music, while the Frozen album shifted 3.53 million. (Nielsen’s 2014 tracking year ran from Dec. 30, 2013 through Dec. 28, 2014.)” ~Billboard
“America’s sweetheart [Taylor Swift] has been writing perfect pop tunes since the day she hit Nashville. Yet it’s still a delectable shock to hear her ditch the banjos for an album of expert Top 40 gloss – like Dylan going electric, except with more songs about Harry Styles. She sounds right at home over these Max Martin beats, sick and otherwise.”
BMI, engineering music since 1939, writes, “In pop, urban, hip-hop, and dance music, a musical backing track is typically created first. This track (sometimes called the musical bed) consists of the accompaniment—the chord progressions and all instrumentation, such as the keyboard, bass, guitar, and percussion parts—but it does not include a melody or lyric for the vocalist to sing. The melody and lyric that is sung ‘on top’ of the music track is referred to as the topline.”
Capo 3 Standard D tuning
G, D/F#, Em7, Cadd9
This is my melody… my music!!!
#Music #WritingMusic #TaylorSwift #Swifties #1989WorldTour #TS1989 #Inspiration
#Billyrella #Faith#Hope #Charity #Peace #Love #NotABadLoveStory #ROYKO
Watch Taylor’s new video for “Blank Space”. No animals, trees, automobiles or actors were harmed in the making of this video. Taylor’s new release 1989 is Av…
Taylor Swift and my family are LIAR FUCKERS UNCLEAN FAGGOT JEW BITCH CUNTS!!!
Taylor Swift GO TAKE A FUCKING BATH FAKE PIG JEW BITCH WHORE ASS-PIRATE FAGGOT DICK LIPS CUNT!!!
I GOT A FUCKING TEXT YESTERDAY FROM MY JEW BITCH CUNT INDIAN GIVER AUNTIE AT 4:04 PM M/S/T and that CUNT FAGGOT LIAR WHORE BITCH JEW CUNT Taylor Alison Swift also posted at 4:04!!!
GO SUCK SUM FAGGOT DICK TAYLOR SWIFT CAUSE ALL YOUR GOOD AT IS BEING A LIAR CUNT FAME WHORE!!!
THAT fucking DJ #1313 in your case was going to say “EVERYONE GRABS HER ASS” cause that is all the guys talk about cause your such a loose cunt FAGGOT WHORE!!! Hands To Myself #Hiddleswift JEW BITCH FAGGOT DICK LIPS ASSHOLE LIAR THIEF CUNT!!!
Tell TAYLOR JEW BITCH CUNT WHORE FAG HAG POWER BEARD and SLOPPY JOE BILLY ALWYN to FUCK OFF AND #IDWLF!!!
HER WHOLE SQUAD IS A BUNCH OF LIARS CUNTS…
LUCKY FOR YOU ON THIS TECHNICALITY OTHER WISE I WOULD HAVE DESTROYED THAT LIAR BITCH IN THE MEDIA…
FAKE ASS BOOBS AND FACE AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE…
FAKE ASS LIAR BITCH WHORE!!!
¶ 1 Pursuant Colo.Const.Art. II § 24 & U.S.C.Amend I Right to Petition William Robert “Billy bob” Bramscher on behalf of Taylor Swift &c does humbly submit this Petition to THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Hon. Marcia S. KRIEGER, Chief Judge in re 2015CV031933 Mueller v. Swift 15-cv-1974-WJM-KLM. The right to petition Government is “among the most precious of the liberties safe guarded by the Bill of Rights”, United Mine Worders of America, Dist. 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association, U.S. 1967, 389 U.S. 217, 222, 88 S.Ct. 353, 356, and this right is protected in various forms to include appeals to one or all three branches of the Government. California Motor Transportation Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, U.S. 1972, 404 U.S. 508, 510, 92 S.Ct. 609, 611-12.
¶ 2 When a judge knows that s/he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving her/him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost. Rankin v. Howard, 1980, 633 F.2d 844, cert denied, Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed. 2d 326. In Rankin v. Howard the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona District Court dismissal based upon absolute judicial immunity, finding that both necessary immunity prongs were absent; later, in Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, the Ninth Circuit, en banc, criticized the “judicial nature” analysis it had published in Rankin as unnecessarily restrictive. But Rankins’ ultimate result was not changed, because Judge HOWARD had been independently divested of absolute judicial immunity by his complete lack of jurisdiction. “Where there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to jurisdiction.” Piper v. Pearson, 1872, 2 Gray 120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 1872, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646. A judge must be acting within his jurisdiction as to subject matter and person, to be entitled to immunity from civil action for his acts. Davis v. Burris, 1938, 51 Ariz. 220, 75 P.2d 689. Generally, judges are immune from suit for judicial acts within or in excess of their jurisdiction even if those acts have been done maliciously or corruptly; the only exception being for acts done in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Gregory v. Thompson, C.A.Ariz.1974, 500 F.2d 59.
¶ 3 8. This AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND fails to specify which subsection of the Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13 Courts and Court Procedure §13-1-124 “long-arm statute” was allegedly violated. This section requires purposeful acts [cf. Mens Rea] performed within forum state by defendant in relation to the contract. Weyrich v. Lively, 361 F. Supp. 1147 (D. Colo. 1973). This section and §13-1-125 are sometimes referred to as the “long arm” or “single act” statute. Hoen v. District Court, 159 Colo. 451, 412 P.2d 428 (1966); Cox v. District Court, 160 Colo. 437, 417 P.2d 792 (1966); Geer Co. v. District Court, 172 Colo. 48, 469 P.2d 734 (1970). Section is procedural, not substantive. This statute, an example of “long arm” statutes, is “procedural” rather than “substantive” and may operate retrospectively. Its effect is not to create a right or liability where none existed before; its only effect is to broaden the procedure whereby one seeking redress against an alleged tortfeasor may compel him to answer in the forum initially determined by the plaintiff to be the most convenient. Smith v. Putnam, 250 F. Supp. 1017 (D. Colo. 1965). A plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing of threshold jurisdiction, which may be determined from the allegations of the complaint, to withstand defendant’s motion to dismiss under, C.R.C.P. 12(b)(2). Pioneer Astro Indus., Inc. v. District Court, 193 Colo. 409, 566 P.2d 1067 (1977). The mere existence of a contract executed by a Colorado resident, is not sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over an absent nonresident defendant. To hold otherwise would offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Hydraulics Unlimited Mfg. Co. v. B/J Mfg. Co., 323 F. Supp. 996 (D. Colo.), aff’d, 449 F.2d 775 (10th Cir. 1971). Contacts found insufficient where sale took place outside of Colorado and issues of tort concerned creation of contract and terms. Vickery v. Amarillo Freightliner Sales, Inc., 695 P.2d 306 (Colo. App. 1984). Jurisdiction is not proper in Colorado merely because one of the parties to a contract is a Colorado resident. Ruggieri v. Gen. Well Serv., Inc., 535 F. Supp. 525 (D. Colo. 1982); SGI Air Holdings II LLC v. Novartis Int’l, AG, 192 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Colo. 2002). Where a New York resident contracted to have brochures mailed throughout the United States, including Colorado, and where said New York resident opened a checking account in Colorado to receive the money generated by the mailing, there were sufficient contacts to allow in personam jurisdiction by Colorado courts. At Home Magazine v. District Court, 194 Colo. 331, 572 P.2d 476 (1977). Execution of promissory notes, given in conjunction with and as part and parcel of the contract for purchase of Colorado real property, constituted sufficient acts to meet the minimum contacts test. Brownlow v. Aman, 740 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir. 1984). Phone calls, letters, facsimiles, and e-mails in addition to a contract, although unsigned, provide evidence that foreign defendant pursued a continuing business relationship sufficient to meet the minimum contacts requirement. AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Ltd., 514 F.3d 1054 (10th Cir. 2008). Execution, in California, of contract executed in Colorado by another, by guarantor, who was California resident, does not provide that quantum of minimum contact with Colorado such that the maintenance of a suit against the guarantor to recover on the contract would not offend traditional notions of due process. D.E.B. Adjustment Co. v. Dillard, 32 Colo. App. 184, 508 P.2d 420 (1973). Defendant Taylor Swift &c lacks sufficient contacts with Colorado for Colorado courts to exercise jurisdiction over defendant where no contracts exist between any defendants and this plaintiff. Cf. Sender v. Powell, 902 P.2d 947 (Colo. App. 1995).
¶ 4 See also Execution of contract within state. If a nonresident comes to Colorado and, within the boundaries of this state, executes a contract and receives earnest money, the defendant is within the purview of the Colorado long arm statute, and it does not offend traditional notions of fair play to require the defendant to appear in a federal district court in Colorado when a dispute arises over the return of the earnest money. East Vail Townhomes, Inc. v. Eurasian Dev. D.A., Inc., 716 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1983). Contract negotiations, plus Colorado is place of “entering into”, are sufficient. Where negotiations leading to the contract upon which this action is brought were conducted in Colorado, and the contract itself provided that Colorado is the place of “entering into” the agreement, nondomiciliary defendant’s contracts were constitutionally sufficient to support service under long arm statute. Clinic Masters, Inc. v. McCollar, 269 F. Supp. 395 (D. Colo. 1967). Contract for the transport of inmates from other states to Colorado constitutes the transaction of business within the state and establishes the general jurisdiction requirement that contacts with the forum state are systematic and continuous. Gwynn v. Transcor Am., Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (D. Colo. 1998). See also Activity in furtherance of a contract is sufficient to give the court long arm jurisdiction. If the defendant purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting business in the forum state, this is enough to give the court jurisdiction. It is not even necessary that defendant or his agent be physically present in the state for the purpose of transacting business. Colorado-Florida Living, Inc. v. Deltona Corp., 338 F. Supp. 880 (D. Colo. 1972). See also Contract for the transport of inmates from other states to Colorado constitutes the transaction of business within the state and establishes the general jurisdiction requirement that contacts with the forum state are systematic and continuous. Gwynn v. Transcor Am., Inc., supra.
¶ 5 Taylor Swift &c are VICTIMS to include yet not be limited to OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENTAL CONDUCT in violation of Judicial due process a principle required by the Constitution that when the state or federal government acts in such a way that denies a citizen of a life, liberty, or property interest, the person must first be given notice and the opportunity to be heard. See EXHIBIT 7.
¶ 6 One of the most fundamental questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. A jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components:
- whether there is personal jurisdiction [aka whether the court may even hear the case involving the particular defendant(s)]. This is further broken down into 3 categories (See Pennoyer v. Neff for additional information):
- in personam jurisdiction
- in rem jurisdiction
- quasi in rem jurisdiction
¶ 7 Limitations to This Power.—The principal function of court rules is that of regulating the practice of courts as regards forms, the operation and effect of process, and the mode and time of proceedings. However, rules are sometimes employed to state in convenient form principles of substantive law previously established by statutes or decisions. But no such rule “can enlarge or restrict jurisdiction. Nor can a rule abrogate or modify the substantive law”. This rule is applicable equally to courts of law, equity, and admiralty, to rules prescribed by the Supreme Court for the guidance of lower courts, and to rules “which lower courts make for their own guidance under authority conferred”. As incident to the judicial power, courts of the United States possess inherent authority to supervise the conduct of their officers, parties, witnesses, counsel, and jurors by self– preserving rules for the protection of the rights of litigants and the orderly administration of justice.
¶ 8 The term jurisdiction can be best understood by being compared to “power”. Any court possesses jurisdiction over matters only to the extent granted to it by the Constitution, and/or legislation of the sovereignty on behalf of which it functions (ex: a state court in Mississippi may need statutory permission by the Mississippi legislature to hear certain types of cases). The question of whether a given court has the power to determine a jurisdictional question is itself a jurisdictional question. Such a legal question is referred to as “jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction”.
¶ 9 Subject matter jurisdiction is the power of a court to adjudicate a particular type of matter and provide the remedy demanded. A court must have jurisdiction to enter a valid, enforceable judgment on a claim. Where jurisdiction is lacking, litigants, through various procedural mechanisms, may retroactively challenge the validity of a judgment.
¶ 11 The jurisdiction of the court to render the particular judgement is always a proper subject inquiry. Subject matter jurisdiction is a matter of law that appellate courts review de novo. State ex rel. Suthers v. Johnson Law Grp., PLLC, 2014 COA 150, p14, 350 P.3d 961.
INT. ROCCO’S APARTMENT NIGHT ONE HOUR LATER
The three are partying hard. There’s a pizza surrounded by
Guinness cans as they whoop it up, sitting at the round table.
Rocco wears one of the masks. They’re all drunk. The house
cat is lounging on the table comfortably.
You fuckin’ guys. You ruined me. I’m
fuckin’ done. Permanent package boy.
Who says that? You could take credit
What are you serious?
Yeah, fuck it. If you think about
it, it’s all you can do really. You
can’t tell him it was us. Go in
braggin’ and shit.
Climb the corporate ladder, boy. Don
Fuck it! I’m doing it. I deserve it.
I’ve been working for those fat
bastards since I was in high school
and look at this place.
The boys nod in agreement.
(working into a frenzy)
They’re fuckin’ me man! Hey, they
can suck my pathetic little dick.
And I’ll dip my nuts in marinara
just so the fat fucks can get a taste
of home while they’re at it. That’s
it, it’s done, I’m doing it.
Rocco slams his fist down on the table next to Murphy’s gun.
The gun goes off with a bang! and blows the lounging cat
right off the table. A softball-sized hole is blasted in the
wall as a large splatter of blood sprays the area surrounding the hole.
Everyone is in shock for a second.
I can’t fuckin’ believe that just
Suggestions: Mountain Biking, Cute, Astrology.
Which Of Taylor Swift’s Previous Boyfriends Are Actually Gay? Taylor Swift Dubbed ‘Power Beard,’ Allegedly Dated Gay Men: From Jake Gyllenhaal to Harry Styles!! Taylor Swift Jealous Of Harry Styles’ “Dunkirk” Success? JEW BITCH CUNT FAKE BOOBS FAKE FACE FAKE JOKE LIAR THIEF UNGRATEFUL WHORE!!!
Truth rating: 1
Where’s my cat?
I killed your fuckin’ cat, you druggie
You… oh god, why?
I felt it would bring closure to our
You killed my… my…
She stops, unsure of the cat’s name.
Your what?! Your fuckin’ what?!
(puts his gun to his
Your what, bitch? I’ll shoot myself
in the head, you can tell me that
cats name! Go ahead… Your what?
Your precious little…
(waiting for her
Peeperman? WRONG? What color was
It was… It was…
Male or female, bitch?!!
Don’t you yell at her you fuckin’
Shut your fat ass, Rayvie! I can’t
buy a pack of smokes without running
into nine guys you fucked.
Don’t you yell at her!
Rocco rummages through her purse and finds her car keys.
All right, let’s get the fuck outta